Wikisource talk:Scriptorium/Archives/2008
 | This page is an archive (please do not modify) |
Two things
[edit]First, the Scriptorium really needs another archive, through July or so, because the page is very long. Second, I think we should only have the header, etc., translated for languages that are here, not in their own subdomains. Each subdomain has its own scriptorium anyway, so we don't need to welcome those users here, right? --Cromwellt|talk 23:53, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
- Could you explain? What you said is a little confusing.96.53.149.117 12:53, 6 December 2008 (UTC)
6 Tabs At The Top
[edit]Edits are being protected. I requested uprotection. In the mean time, I'll post what I wanted here"
I don't care how the tabs are arranged, be they 3 by 2 or 6 by 1, but 6 tabs, instead of 4 needs to be implemented.
What I am talking about is that, say, for this page, we have "project page", "discussion", "edit this page", and "history", at the top. These are for navigational, editing, forensic, and learning purposes. Now, this isn't very user friendly, and people have argued that having 6 instead of the 4 we have now would make it more clumsy. And that if anons made an account, they could use CSS to implement this. Well some anons don't like making accounts. And it is more clumsy right now, and confusing, where by pressing the discussion tab, and then edit, it is counter-intuitive. People also lose thoughts, depending on their connection speed, by having to wait for extra pages to load. It's even hard to understand with the 4 tabs switch over system that is used right now.
Another problem are the templates: going to Template:Navbox Province of Italy, at its top left corner, you will see v • d • e. This too needs the 3 other analogs. You can put them in 3 by 2, or 6 by 1, but for the same reasons above, specifically for server resource times/loading times and userfriendlyness/navigational ease.96.53.149.117 12:59, 6 December 2008 (UTC)