actionem qiiam pasionem^ in eadem intellegi persona^. Non aliter igitur potest proferri* is", in quern aliquid agitur, nisi per obliquos casus. ...'Aiaxse interfecit/ rursus enim ' interfecit*' ad ipsum (ii. p. 16) Aiacem reciprocatur. lure igitur nos, qui in plerisque antiqui- tatem seruauimus gratiae*^,..
Quaeritur igitur, cur, si ' mei' pro i/uov'^ et efiavrov^ et 'tni' pro P. 209b aov^ et o-eayroO^ accipiantur*"'^*, tamen nominatiuos habeant, ' sui/ cum pro ov^ et eavrov^ accipitur, non habeat nominatiuum ? Ad quod multa sunt dicenda : primum quod, si loco aspirationis...quae est in principio tertiae person ae apud Graecos, 'u est i, s prae- lo poneretur nominatiuo^ esset dubitatio ad coniunctionem ' si ' ; quo- modo enim ov ' sui ' et ol" ' sibi ' et e ' se,' sic nominatiuus i ' si ' debuit esse^. Et in aliis enim dictionibus" quibusdam solent Eolis sequentes uel in digamma uel in s conuertere aspirationem*... Et fortasse ideo ex eo per anastrophen factum est 'is' aliud pronomen', '5 quod propterea puto et relatiuum esse, quomodo t apud Graecos^";
P. 209a 1- N^ arindi bed hi sui t innachamthuislib nobed ingnim t incesad
acht doasilbthcer triit som gniim t chesad^ doneuch • 2. hisv
oathuislib 3. .. ni rubai anisin
rvomin-A,ivo 4. .. inti
5. .i. ani as interfea'^ 6. .i. rothechtatsom. hijius 7 heulus «o
7. t .i. geniiin chintig .i. mei . mux 8. t genitm azYre6thaig
P. 209 b 1- geniiin chint^ 2. ^enitiu aiYrebthaig 3. .i. cwm 3a. si accipiantttr tamen nomtnatiwos hiibeant .i. camaiph thechta.ii^ ainmnidi^ 4. .i. ^em'tiu chintig A. sui • 5. ^renitiu aiYrebthaig .i. sui A. inddi fosodin 6. dond ainmnid nobiad^ dokvi 7, .i. 25 combad • si • apud nos 8. air dosoat eo/dai tinfed indigaivi 9. .i. insin 10. [in marg.] Aliud pronome/i .i. is allail^ proxiomen ani sin frisui- A. an -is- hisin- quod propterea puto .i. med dumuinursa olpriscien issed dorigeni pronomen natdrcadach di • is • anisin uare^ is 6^ pronome?i atdrcadach atd la grcecu • >- 3°
P. 209a 1. not that the action or the passion is in sui or in its oblique
cases, but through it action or passion is ascribed to some one. 2. in
sui with its cases. 3. i.e. that cannot be in the nominative. 5. i.e.
the word interfecit. 6. which they (the Latins) had in knowledge and
guidance. 7. or i.e. a genitive of the finite, i.e. mei mine. 8. or 35
a genitive of the possessive.
P. 209 b 1- a genitive of the finite. 2. a genitive of the possessive. 3. i.e. however, they have nominatives. 4. i.e. a genitive of the finite, i.e. sui. 5. a genitive of the possessive, i.e. s)ii, i.e. his in ac- cordance with that. 6. to the nominative which would be to sui. 40 7. i.e. with us it would be si. 8. for the Aeolians convert aspiration into digamma. 9. i.e. that. 10. i.e. that, to wit, that is another pronoun from sui, to wit that is, quod p. p., i.e. this is what I think, says Priscian, this is what made an anaphoric pronoun of is, because it is (derived) from an anaphoric pronoun (?) which the Greeks have. 45 [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10]
- ↑ leg. graeciae
- ↑ MS. efiaov et efia aov et creavrov accipiantur
- ↑ MS. Hoy
- ↑ om. MS.
- ↑ MS. cesad
- ↑ .i. iiber accipiantwr, das in der ersten zeile der seite steht, glosse : .i. c ; weiter oben am rande ohne verweisungszeichen : i si etc., Thur- neysen
- ↑ The aspiration is strange. Is it due to camaiph?
- ↑ MS. no bia
- ↑ rectius alaill
- ↑ MS. ore with va written over 6.
- ↑ MS. o, which Ascoli prints as if it were Greek or Latin
